Could it be that history is simply the emotional & social expression of the laws of nature?

[Lio Spiegler- KabU Instructor]

Could it be that history is simply the emotional & social expression of the laws of nature?

[Sol Belo]

Only in theory! In practice, history is susceptible to the sponsoring bias.

[Leo]

Absolutely!

[Richard Lively]

I think that History is just like everything else just as you suggested, its dynamic just like the two forces of nature are.   History is a byproduct of humanity just like our actions are a byproduct of humans.  Everything pretty much breaks down  this way into two simple forces of Give and Take creating another byproduct of Give and Take

[Ralitza]

History is a united story of what people have percieved to be real. It can never be objective. Jews have one perception. Hindus have another. Mayas have seen their part of reality. Women would write a different history then men.

If Nature would write history, whose perspective would she choose to be “real”?

So “yes”, history is en expression of our emotions and social structures and how the laws of nature are working with us.  So I don’t think that one group of humans have the right to write history and call it “truth”.

[Jan Koons]

could be.

[David]

I don’t know. A sense of humour, an ability to reflect on one’s situation – the laws of nature don’t seem to tell the whole story.

 

[Autor(a)]

Respuestas