- This topic has 1,513 replies, 118 voices, and was last updated hace 1 día, 9 hours by
.
- Respuestas
Hi, I want to ask about the use of terms in multiple ways. for example the word Torah, it means Light, and sometimes it means the Book of Moses. the word Light also means the creator? also the Sefirot is used in multiple ways, we read that in multiple text, for example Malchut sometimes called Faith, and sometimes Called Prayer, and the prayer sometimes called Shechina. ZA, sometimes called Moses, and other entities. why is that, can we understand that in a clear way? sorry for the challenging question.
It’s impossible for me to take these names out of context, but the general answer is that they refer to a reality. So the terms are flexible. For example I can be called Gianni, dad, son, teacher, all of them respectful and correct names. Each is appropriate for a different situation. In spirituality, the name is according to the state of the one attaining. There aren’t so many things in spirituality. There’s ten Sefirot. But the Kli changes and so the reality is attained in many different ways, and called by many names.
Thank you Gianni for the response on the Torah. Another question, we read an article
recently that referenced the 18 Blessings by Rabash, do you encourage us to say the 18 blessings in the morning and what is the spiritual logic behind these Blessings?
Thank you
The writer of that ancient prayer wrote it out of his feeling of the Upper World. It’s an example. That if the options are to live in this world with no way to attain spirituality myself, then it’s better to at least repeat what someone else wrote. At least I’ll think of higher things in that moment. But now that the wisdom of Kabbalah is revealed, I need to use it to come to a prayer that comes out of my heart – and not to repeat the words of others and fantasize that I’m close to such states. The Creator has an x-ray of my heart and I can’t lie. But for me to express what’s in it, corrects me when I turn to Him with it.
“But when there is someone who is not from this society, no seriousness should be shown, but to equalize externally with the person who has just come in. In other words, avoid speaking of serious matters, but only of things that suit the one who has just entered, who is called “an uninvited guest.”” from purpose of society 2. What does this mean?
Hi,
I have a basic question. We refer to the Torah so much and we reference the Torah in everything yet we are never encouraged or instructed to read it. Why is this ?And a follow up question , if the Zohar is from the spiritual realm , isn’t the Torah from an even higher realm as it was handed to us by the Creator Himself? So shouldn’t we be reading the Torah itself too?
As Baal HaSulam writes in The Essence of the Wisdom of Kabbalah the Torah can be written in 4 languages, one of which is the language of Kabbalah. Each is writing about the same Upper World. However, when a person reads the Torah directly, especially without the commentary of Baal HaSulam and Rabash, they aren’t able to only think that this is about spirituality. He quickly starts imagining some historical matters, etc. The Zohar is a bit closer to us, however it’s still a must to read it only with the Ladder commentary of Baal HaSulam. He sort of “spoils” it for us, disallowing us to get lost in fantasies, because he intersperses the translation of what is written in the language of legends, laws, and so on – with the language of Kabbalah. This way, one knows for certain that he doesn’t know what the text is talking about – it’s clearly not from the reality I’m familiar with. This forces me to long for the Upper Light to change me, help me, etc. And this longing is actually the main thing. It’s the only thing I can really do that is near to spirituality.
I understood that some of our instructors ( e.g. Gil Shir ) are physicists. Question: in science, the concept of entropy speaks about total disorder in the end. Kabbalist Rav Laitman speaks of entropy as a state were everything is balancing out, coming to a final rest. The light is completely at rest, in beginning and end, so is entropy comparable with Gmar Tikkun, the final correction? Second law of thermodynamics states that energy is conserved, nothing is waisted, so the beginning is the end, is this science meets kabbalah? I love to hear/see Gil about this topic in for instance, a Kabbalah explained simply lesson. Or was there already such a topic on KaBu?
If so, I am much interested to hear more. Thanks in advance.
There’s an episode on physics but we don’t talk about entropy. We can boil it down simply and say that everything we see is a result of the Shattering of the soul of Adam HaRishon. After that, you just have offshoots of this action, which are all the laws of physics. If you want to relate it to the idea of entropy, we can say that what happens to this broken soul is that it’s brokenness gets increasingly revealed. That’s why you have such laws. Detail it as much as you want, but that’s all that’s happening. And there’s nothing to do in the universe besides connect the hearts of people, because all the other inanimate, vegetative, animate parts of reality appear in brokenness because of the brokenness of the connection between the hearts of people. In that shattering, all the distances within the universe are depicted. It’s true, that because this depends on free choice on the part of people, and no other action depends on their free choice, the laws of physics can’t take this free choice into account, nor can they account for the help of the Upper Force that comes in when people exercise this free choice, and therefore it looks like the inevitable state of the system over time is disarray. That’s only because the system is designed to show us more and more our broken state, till we can’t ignore it and can’t tolerate it, and will demand a correction.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.