- This topic has 163 replies, 50 voices, and was last updated hace 3 semanas, 3 días by
.
- Respuestas
Hiya, I’m having trouble understanding how I can practically work with an intention for something that I can’t see or feel. I have knowledge about the qualities of the creator but it just seems odd to me that in practice I should not care primarily for fellow man but aim my goals toward the creator first… somehow this seems selfish, like the desire for knowing the creator is for my own gain? I’m quite confused…. I’ve just watched Julian’s lesson video 1.3
Maybe I’m asking too soon and my confusion will be resolved in the following videos but anyway some feedback would be appreciated, thank you
There’s something to what you’re saying and you’re right, it will be resolved. But not in a few simple words can it be explained how right you are, that you only reach the Creator through the prism of our reality, and it is not that one can aim directly at the Creator. Because aiming at Him means aiming at equivalence with His attributes. And His main attribute is that He loves His Creation and wants to bring all its parts to the greatest good, which for now is something we can’t even imagine. So the wisdom of Kabbalah is the method of tying all the reality to one source and responding back, through that same reality, to the source of it all, the Creator.
Het lijkt erop dat de groep waarin je bent, als kabbalist, een soort coachende taak heeft. Welke goede intentie naar de creator ik moge hebben, hoe blijf je als groep in balans?
Translation: It seems that the group you are in, as a kabbalist, has some kind of coaching task. What good intentions towards the creator may I have, how do you stay in balance as a group?
You’ll have to see when you get into more contact with the group. There are a few parameters that a person must always check. Like gauges on a plane or some other important machinery. These parameters are always within your attitude towards the friends in the group. The Creator always pushes them out of calibration, and we have to bring them back to correct calibration.
In the four stages of light and partzufim there is bestowal at the top (Galgalta – Eynaim) and reception at the bottom (AHP). Please could you kindly elaborate on the meaning of “AHP” – I seem to have missed this! Thanks
Hi Beverly,
We are working in the direction that invites this force in nature called “messiah”. Here is blog about it from our teacher, Dr. Laitman: https://laitman.com/2016/05/who-is-the-messiah/#gsc.tab=0
Hello Giani,
A few months ago, Seraphim asked a question (#184927) that I also would like to have an answer on, but it didn’t get a reply. I think it’s because he asked it in the “reflect” forum instead of the “ask” forum.
Would you be so kind to give us your point of view on this topic please? Thanks, Tom
Ok. Here’s what Seraphim asked. It’s a long one, so sorry for that:
It blows my mind that in talking about the history of spirituality Julian only mentions the line of (Jewish) Kabbalists who crossed the machsom into G”E and devekut with the spiritual world. Of course, it’s wonderful that they did this, but I think we should give credit where credit is due by acknowledging that many, many other adepts in spiritual lineages of other traditions who also crossed that machsom. To name but a few (and this is just the tip of the iceberg, as it were):
1. The lineage of (Hindu) rishis who gave us the Upanishads back in the 3rd millenium BCE, and who have been in direct contact with all levels of the spiritual worlds up until this day through school like Advaita Vedanta and Raja Yoga.
2. The lineage of Christian mystics and gnostics who have been ascending to the highest levels of the Upper World, as proven by texts like the Nag Hammadi corpus, the Philokalia, and other works, and who have continued a living lineage of spiritual mastery and enlightenment in places like Mount Athos for centuries.
3. The living and extant lineage of Tibetan lamas and other Buddhist “Kabbalists” whose spiritual attainment was so high that they were even able to document what happens after death in the Tibetan Book of the Dead.
4. The multitudinous Islamic wisdom masters in various Sufi orders around the world whose descriptions of the spiritual world (above the machsom) could fill whole libraries, and who continue to teach and convey their wisdom in many countries throughout the world.
Like I said, this is just a tiny sampling the many, many living masters and contemporary non-Jewish kabbalists who have attained the highest strata of the spiritual world. I believe with all my heart that we should reach out to these schools as fellow lovers of truth. Why enclose ourselves in a little cultish bubble of our own, when we could bring our own unique instrument to the great orchestra of wisdom already thriving in the world? We talk a lot about connection among ourselves, like some kind of “chosen people” (which is a little snobbish, if you ask me). Why not connect with those who perhaps know just as much – if not more – than Rav Laitman about spiritual worlds? What are we afraid of?
If, as Julian said, “the only people who are able to understand and implement” the wisdom of Kabbalah (which is nothing less than the exclusive truth about the way things are) are Kabbalists, and the only authentic school of Kabbalah in the world today is Bnei Baruch, and the only living master and link to “last authentic Kabbalist (Baal HaSulam” is Rav Laitman, that means that Rav Laitman is the only person in the world who truly understands and can implement the Laws of Nature and the Truth about Reality??? Not only is this utterly mind-blowing, but it’s not a little hard to swallow, wouldn’t you agree?
Don’t get me wrong, I love Rav Laitman, but unless you can name other Kabbalists – perhaps from other wisdom traditions? – who also have direct access to the Upper Force and Reality, basically what you’re doing is making out Rav Laitman to be little less than Moshiach.
Ah, yes. So this is his question. I don’t answer such questions, but since it’s not from you, I’ll answer. The whole approach is incorrect. Can a person learn with such an attitude, that you’re coming to tell the teacher what’s what? Where is such an approach accepted? If I go to study physics from a great doctor of physics, will he entertain such an approach? Or, I go to study acting from some great acting teacher, or music teacher. That’s not how you learn. And Kabbalists’ attitude towards such people is very simple: go and see what’s out there, perhaps there’s another place for you. That has been Kabbalists approach not just in our times, but throughout history. Because already the fact that one has such an approach indicates that he lacks even the foundation to begin learning, and there’s no hope for him to advance. He’s already filled up with his own attitude so there’s no room for something else. So, there’s nothing to do with the person except show him the door out. This attitude will change, but not because he will get an answer from me and the answer will be what he wants. Rather, the Upper Force will work on a us, show us that we get nowhere with our egoistic opinions, and when we get humbled by many life blows, we’ll come on our knees and accept a method as-is. That’s the precondition – that you’re willing to accept a method as-is. It could be a different method from some other teacher. But you must go to that teacher and accept his method as-is. Because who are you that you know what the method should be? It’s like little kids telling mommy and daddy how to parent. If I don’t already have attainment of the Upper Worlds, then I have nothing to say about how to get there and how the teacher is teaching.
I never answer a question that is not really a question but an accusation, because even if I have what to respond with, the lesson of learning how to approach a study is much more important. That approach is an uneducated one, that of someone who never learned how to study.
Of course there were many Kabbalists we don’t know about. Of course one who is not a Kabbalists himself has no way of knowing who – and it also doesn’t matter who. One doesn’t know what crossing the Machsom is, what spirituality is, nor what a Kabbalist is. The only question is are you ready to become a Kabbalist, embrace a method of becoming one, and follow the advice of a teacher exactly. That’s one’s only hope of attaining spirituality.
Thanks for answering. I felt some skepticism in replies from others because such questions were left open, so I think this will definitely help.
I feel 100% committed to become a Kabbalist. The fact that the kabbalistic texts, the songs of friends, the lessons from the Rav,… all soften my heart and strengthen my desire to unite, gives me confidence that this is the path I have to follow.
Hola Gianni
Se puede afirmar que Nimrod no como personaje historico (ramas) , sino como cualidad espiritual (raíces) representa la capacidad de separación, confusion e individualidad del ego en Maljut. Que cualidades especiales representa Abraham, ya que es claro que antes y después de su descubrimiento del conocimiento de la kabala y del método kabalistico aplicado para el desarrollo espiritual, el era ya un individuo excepcional.
Translation:
Hello Gianni
It can be affirmed that Nimrod not as a historical character (branches), but as a spiritual quality (roots) represents the capacity of separation, confusion and individuality of the ego in Malchut. What special qualities Abraham represents, since it is clear that before and after his discovery of the knowledge of the kabbalah and the kabbalistic method applied to spiritual development, he was already an exceptional individual.
Hi Henry,
Even if there were such people, because if there is a spiritual root it will touch the branch too somehow. How – it’s not worthwhile to speculate because who knows if it’s how our minds imagine. So, Kabbalists never write about history in our world. Abraham represents the quality of Hafetz Hesed (delighted in Mercy). It’s one who wants mercy from the Will To Receive dominating him. And if we want to talk about Abraham the Kabbalist, then like all Kabbalists he was a regular person of some kind before feeling the Point in the Heart that pulled him to the direct path to the Creator.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.