- This topic has 60 replies, 31 voices, and was last updated hace 5 meses, 2 semanas by
.
- Respuestas
Gianni, this lesson, although technically difficult, fills me with a deeper yearning for the light. I am finding that the more I study your lessons on the World of AK, the more I feel a sense or taste of the beauty of this wisdom, and the environment provided by BB that continues to point us all to the goal of adhesion with the Creator. It is all profoundly humbling.
With that in mind, could you please clarify these terms for me: the Peh, the Tabur, the Parsa. Is the Peh basically a masach in Galgata, then AB, SAG, etc? Are the Tabur and the Parsa each a type of masach too? Thank you for your dedication to the goal. —Joy
Hi Joy,
Peh is a “location”. We can’t say it’s the Masach itself. The Masach could be positioned at the Peh, which is generally the place of Malchut of the Rosh. The Masach could also rise to Nikvey Enaiim (pupils of the eyes) for example, the place of Bina, where the resulting Partzuf would have the quality of Bina. Where in the Rosh the Zivug (coupling) with the Upper Light occurs, determines with which quality we are working, and thus what kind of Partzuf will come out.
The principle is the same for Tabur, however now we are in the general Guf (body) of the system. You think it’s a Screen because indeed Malchut of Tzimzum Aleph stands always in this place, guarding the Tzimzum, so that no Light of Hochma gets through.
In that sense we can also regard Parsa as a kind of limit, however we don’t say “Masach” usually because Masach means not a limitation placed on me from Above – like we have now, where all the Light is hidden, as in “guard yourself a little from below, and I will guard you a lot from Above.” But rather a Masach is when Machsom (barrier) becomes a limitation I myself hold onto, and above this limitation I have a Masach.
This is why Light doesn’t come down to us in our place. Rather we have to rise above Parsa, through equivalence of form with that place.
The video instructor is awesome! Your last reply
“The Sefirot in AK go in the same order as the 4 Phases of Direct Light. So, Galgalta, AB, SAG, MA BON correspond to Keter, Hochma, Bina, Zeir Anpin, Malchut.”
helps me clear up some stumbling blocks. Using different names for the usual keter, Hochma etc. just threw me off.
Thanks.
I don’t completely understand but it helped when I stopped trying to understand the material more with a sense of feeling and understanding, instead of mere facts. Is it ok that I don’t completely understand the material but get a some very small sense of what is happening with the Light and the Partzuf and Kli? I’m not even sure the question is correct.
Yes, that’s enough. It’s the effort that brings the Light that brings the inner change that brings the feeling that brings the understanding. My job is only to give you enough to somehow hang on to the lesson, so that meanwhile the Light works on the student.
One more question please:
SAG has a record of Aviut 2. If i understand this correctly this means that Yechidah and Haya did not enter the Kli, but only Neshamah, Ruach and Nefesh.
But you say that the light exits in 4 stages, like the Ritz in Paris has only 3 floors now.
Can you please explain why it exits still in 4 stages when only 3 lights entered, or do i have a thinking mistake?
Yes i want to add my desire to the last post. I get the main outline but it’s over my head and hope that one day I will be able to understand the details.
Let me add a question please:
Regarding the inverse relation of lights and vessels, at what Kli in SAG was the Masach exactly when the Zivug for the Nekudot de SAG happened? Was it when Nefesh was still in Bina of the Guf or was it one step later in the process of Hitzdachut?
What matters is that we’re getting into these matters, hopefully with the expectation that the Reforming Light will work and bring us to the feeling, from which, and only from which, can come the understanding. It won’t fit into our corporeal brains, which are built differently than the spiritual worlds. The brain doesn’t enter spirituality.
I can’t start combining the Inverse Relation of Lights and Vessels with other parts. If I understand the Inverse Relation, even in a simple way, that’s already good. If I understand the part about Nekudot de SAG, that’s good as well.
Moreover, it’s best not to even think about SAG in those terms, so as not to get confused. The Nekudot de SAG… what Lights does it have? The Light of Hassidim: pure bestowal without any reception. You can think of it as empty, except for the power of bestowal, the power to remain empty. This is its desire and its fulfilment.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.