Get your questions answered by a KabU instructor.

Inicio Foros Course Forums The Blueprint of Creation 6. Inverse Relation of Lights & Vessels Get your questions answered by a KabU instructor.

Ver publicaciones de 6 de - 7 a 12 (del total de 33)
  • Autor(a)
    Respuestas
    • #337399
      carlos
      Partícipe

      I dont understand the relation between the inner light (the 5 types of light) and the definitions given before of Toc and Sof. Is the partzuf keter malchut that receives these 5 lights all located in Toc? if so what is the point of Sof?

      • #337555

        There’s ten Sefirot of Rosh, ten Sefirot of Toc, and ten Sefirot of Sof. That has to be for it to be a Parzuf as much as a baby must have all of its organs to live. The desire has to be divided into three to be spiritual at all. That is, a part in which there is a calculation in order to bestow about every pleasure (Rosh), a part where the Light is received (Toc), and a part that for now is still in Restriction (Sof).

    • #332597
      Tydus
      Partícipe

      This needs to be taught at schools for kids. its unbelievable. Creator makes me speechless.

    • #321114

      Is there a screen in every of the 5 vessels or only Malchut?

      • #321117

        Every vessel has a screen. Remember the screen is the intention to bestow and not receive unless to bestow. So no spiritual object doesn’t have a screen.

    • #303396
      Denys
      Partícipe

      .

    • #299558
      Ali Nadalipour
      Partícipe

      Great instructor.u said the light is one and will be ever.my question is about 5 lights.they r different frome the first light.or into the kli we feel it differently?

      • #299571

        There’s one simple Upper Light, but each tastes in it something different, according to the vessel he has prepared. Now, the Desire to Receive, on the other hand, is not simple. It’s extremely complex, according to the fact that the Creator wanted to delight the Creator in many ways.

    • #297609
      Marko Podgorsek
      Partícipe

      In the Check For Understanding we have to write an answer.

      I wrote:

      I’m asking myself the same question. I don’t know and I hope I will get an answer later in the course.
      But…
      Let’s say that when lightest desire gets filled so much that it shadows all other desires.

      Like if I have a small nagging pain in my arm and I hit the edge of a table with my knee, I forget about the small nagging pain in my arm and everything is about knee pain now. Now if I turn this analogy around to pleasure it should compute in my brain somehow 😊

       

      You also touched on this topic at the end of the video, but it sounds like a hint for what’s comming next in the course, but it’s not a clear explanation. Could you elaborate more on the “Shouldn’t the greatest desire get the greatest fulfillment, and the small little desire get the lightest fulfillment?”, please.

      • #297667

        Your desire, in that example, is simple: elimination of pain. A bigger pain becomes the center of my attention over a smaller pain. It’s a matter of quantity, not quality. That’s why it’s a simple calculation. But if we’re talking about differing qualities, then it’s not simple. Which is better: the world’s best burger or the world’s best concert. It depends which vessel I have. The Partzuf has 5 distinct vessels of utterly different quality. I can’t enjoy the concert in a vessel for food. By analogy, The Light of Malchut cannot satisfy the vessel of Keter.

Ver publicaciones de 6 de - 7 a 12 (del total de 33)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.