[Brian Israel]

Hi Gianni,

Thank you for your guidance. I understand the perspective of wearing a Kippah as a social norm—”dwelling among my people”—or as an external reminder of the spiritual Screen (Masach).

However, I am curious about a point Michael Laitman frequently emphasizes in his lessons: Given the level that the ego has reached today, doesn’t Kabbalah teach us that physical forms and traditions (like the classical function of religions) are no longer sufficient for spiritual correction, and that the “work in the heart” is what truly matters?

If the Kippah is merely an external copy, doesn’t clinging to such symbols run the risk of diverting focus away from the core essence—the intention of “bestowal”—and back toward empty forms? Where exactly should we draw the line between respecting external traditions and adhering to the internal truth?

I look forward to learning your valuable opinions on this matter.

Best regards,

Brian Israel

[Brian Israel]

Dear KabU  Team,

thank you for your guidance. In our studies on the science of Kabbalah, we also examine the paths followed by valuable teachers like Michael Laitman.

At this point, the place of the Kippah/Yamukah, which is an important symbol in Judaism, has become a matter of curiosity.

As you know, universal principles lie in the depths of Kabbalah.

What is the wisdom behind a Kabbalist leader still wearing a Kippah/ Yamukah?

In fact—even though I am Jewish—I stopped wearing a kippah after I started studying Kabbalah.

We would like to learn your valuable opinions on this matter to expand our knowledge.

Best regards.

Brian Israel

[Author]

Replies