Preparation Prompt: Envision a world where individuals are interconnected through the spiritual principle of love. How would societal dilemmas be approached differently in such a paradigm?

[Julian Edwards- KabU Instructor]

Preparation Prompt: Envision a world where individuals are interconnected through the spiritual principle of love. How would societal dilemmas be approached differently in such a paradigm?

[Lady Bracha]

It would be like a world where everyone contributes, the is an equalization of give and take, no one gets left behind as we connect with points of the heart

[Ben]

Hi Julian,

Love the goatee…I think you should try growing a full beard.

Been thinking a lot about the aspects of love and fear of the Creator we discussed at yesterday’s Q&A.

And that connects directly with your question…

Love and fear can coexist.

Today when I was reading “Attaining the Worlds Beyond” it was mentioning how different expressions of love can evoke anything from longing to hatred (very interesting). Which is why the Creator conceals his love for us until we are of a level of spiritual maturity to accept unconditional love.

Spiritual love differs from egoist love in that it is unconditional and is intertwined with faith.

Faith is the opposite of fear: faith and fear cannot coexist.

In a sense if people of a society possessed spiritual/unconditional love they would have transcended egoistic love, embodied faith, and social dilemmas would no longer exist.

So long as the people in a society are still entangled in egoistic love there will be social dilemmas.

The only difference is that when a significant percentage of people in a society possess spiritual/unconditional love then these dilemmas would be resolved in a more positive and timely manner.

[György]

Through mutual understanding and compassion, and by uplifting each other.

[Peshka]

It will be in practice “Love your neighbour as yourself “.

That will be the greatest thing in the world, to put the needs of others before yours✨

I see a very beautiful picture of the world if that happens, no wars, no crimes, no hunger… etc .

[Don]

Problem solutions would be addressed as what’s good for all rather what’s good for me or mine.  We would all willingly all together for the benefit of each other.

[BASMA]

nos différences ne seraient plus perçues comme menaçantes mais comme enrichissantes et complémentaires.

[Author]

Replies