What do you think was the result of the “Ignored Condition” in Dan Ariely’s research and why?

New Home › Forums › Course Forums › Happiness › 5. The Effects of Social Connections at Work › What do you think was the result of the “Ignored Condition” in Dan Ariely’s research and why?

  • April 21, 2020 at 4:23 am EDT #28482

    KabU
    Participant

    What do you think was the result of the “Ignored Condition” in Dan Ariely’s research and why?

Viewing 4 posts - 25 through 28 (of 28 total)
  • Author
    Replies
    • May 23, 2021 at 4:22 pm EDT #52435
      Rodrigo Tavares
      Participant

      In some way, the recognition served as payment to the participant, in lieu of money. In other words, the difference in the amount of money that was subtracted was compensated with recognition.
      However, when there was no recognition compensation, for money and only the amount of money was decreased, this decrease caused the participant to become demotivated, without recognition compensation to compensate for the demotivation.

    • April 24, 2021 at 1:01 pm EDT #45465
      Renato Rocha de Oliveira
      Participant

      2.25. They lost the motivation. People want to be acknowledged.

    • March 29, 2021 at 1:46 am EDT #43284
      Larry
      Participant

      Ignored = demotivation

    • March 19, 2021 at 8:54 pm EDT #42950
      Juju721
      Participant

      That people would do more because they were ignored ot drove their desire to be acknowledged

  • Author
    Replies
Viewing 4 posts - 25 through 28 (of 28 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.