Forum Replies Created
- AuthorReplies
- May 20, 2025 at 11:02 am EDT in reply to: Ask anything about week 2 lesson and materials and get an answer from a senior Kabbalah instructor. #439087
Curtis AOParticipantHi Seth,
I see you’ve pretty much answered my question as I was looking through the forums
Thank you for the effort,
-Curtis
May 20, 2025 at 10:43 am EDT in reply to: Reflect: Share something from the lesson that blew your mind, or even just gave you a new perspective. #439086
Curtis AOParticipantSometimes I get the answer to my unknowing by forming the question to resolve it
May 20, 2025 at 10:12 am EDT in reply to: Ask anything about week 2 lesson and materials and get an answer from a senior Kabbalah instructor. #439082
Curtis AOParticipantHi Seth,
Is the thought of creation infinite? Is the creator outside the thought of creation thinking/creating it? As we progress through the spiritual world based on the lessons, I understand the ratio between reception and bestowal changes, and we become more and more like the creator. Is the end of the kabbalistic path gaining equivalence of form with the creator? It seems impossible.
Thanks,
-Curtis
May 20, 2025 at 10:09 am EDT in reply to: Ask anything about week 2 lesson and materials and get an answer from a senior Kabbalah instructor. #439079
Curtis AOParticipantMay 18, 2025 at 2:59 pm EDT in reply to: Ask anything about week 2 lesson and materials and get an answer from a senior Kabbalah instructor. #438633
Curtis AOParticipantHello,
I understand the whole of reality is the thought of creation. I am confused about if the creator is separate from the thought of creation. It may be impossible to know. Why can the thought of creation change? Or does it change?
Thanks,
-Curtis
May 18, 2025 at 12:43 pm EDT in reply to: Ask anything about week 2 lesson and materials and get an answer from a senior Kabbalah instructor. #438594
Curtis AOParticipantHello,
If I’m understanding, correctly, there is a flow of bestowal to the will to receive that is variably constant. Is this correct?
Thanks,
-Curtis
- AuthorReplies

