Preparation Prompt: Envision a world where individuals are interconnected through the spiritual principle of love. How would societal dilemmas be approached differently in such a paradigm?

[Julian Edwards- KabU Instructor]

Preparation Prompt: Envision a world where individuals are interconnected through the spiritual principle of love. How would societal dilemmas be approached differently in such a paradigm?

[Paul]

Societal dilemmas are then approached more as dilemmas of the collective.

[Ronny Cervantes]

There will most likely be no lack. No wanting for more. Everyone will look out for each other rather just themselves. There will be proper care and love in the world to go around. No wars or indifference. There will be only the creator in this world thru us. We can look at extremes such as the shamans where they would ostracize people who did not live thru the creator or even denied the creator. Not sure if the world today is ready for that but just an example of how a group is more important than an individual.

[Sheila]

Does this ‘world of individuals’ include All individuals or does the question revolve around just those that are interconnected, such as in a Kabbalistic group? In a group, or a connected group of groups worldwide, such as a Kabalistic congress, there would be only dilemmas of structure, how to accomplish something such as the making of the yearly congress or the making of laws. There would be cooperation to accommodate all needs on a global scale within these groups. The people interconnected spiritually would be more understanding and patient for the people who have not found their points in the heart yet. And as societal dilemmas would still arise because of them the impact of the dilemmas, including the publicity of egoistic desires harming others, would lessen and this would create a climate where things would begin to change to the spiritual direction humanity must find.

[Hannah]

I’d have to eliminate wanting to be special or wanting anything special for myself.  I’d have to trust that the system works for everyone including me.   It’s not hard even now to want to be good to people, but that’s always limited by watching out for “number one”, as they say.   Beyond that, wanting to do good for everyone seems very daunting;  there are a lot of people, and I’m used to experiencing them as being filled with disagreements and competitions.

[Johan]

we would care about other´s necessities and see others as ourselves

[Varda kahalany]

I am not sure that in such a situation there would be ‘societal dilemmas’ because people will be able to relate to each other the same way they relate to themselves so it would prompt a deep understanding that will cancel any sort of societal dilemmas.

[Author]

Replies