Preparation Question: Imagine if people were connected according to the spiritual law of love. How would these many issues be approached differently?

[Julian Edwards- KabU Instructor]

Preparation Question: Imagine if people were connected according to the spiritual law of love. How would these many issues be approached differently?

[Chloe Lymburner]

If we truly loved each other we wouldn’t have to fight for human rights etc.

[Ben]

There wouldn’t be any issues because the spiritual law of love will solve the roots of all the problems.

[Sheree]

The approach would be unity first.  If all were to place the needs of others above our own selfish desire, all would be approached with how to achieve unity, as opposed to how to achieve my own objective.

[Peter]

In a world where people are connected to each other through spiritual law of love, the perspective of looking and resolving issues would shift to its opposite from its current state. I feel that generally speaking our current approach to how we resolves issues is for each side to prove that their side is right or that it is not to blamed, or simply by one side bullying the other to submission. All of our global issues can be resolved right now, today, if we only looked at the issues from perspective of resolution and what is the solution, not which side is right or which side can argue better the righteousness of their position. In the world where spirituality and law of love drives our decisions, issues would resolve based on what is best option for the well being of the Whole. I also imagine that in such a world, issues may even never have the opportunity to arise at all. In such a world smoothly and in harmony, All of Nature would act only to benefits the Whole of Nature.

[Philip Iyov Ecks]

I think that if we lived in such a place, the present experiences we have in this world with all it chaos, wouldn’t exist. Our world would be a much different place indeed.

Shalom.

[Matthew]

People would not be driven by ego, and try to find solutions for common good.

[Author]

Replies