Forum Replies Created
- AuthorReplies
LogynnParticipantThat makes sense. Sometimes if I know a story is going to be scary or difficult I read the spoilers first. It’s hard to let myself invest in actually fully watching the story until I know what’s going to happen. A Kabbalist watching reality wouldn’t do that. They’d have faith in the outcome because the Creator is writing the story. I need to learn to do that because we know the outcome will be good, and that all the parts of the story are necessary, and we can’t get the full amplitude if we don’t let ourselves empathize and identify with the falls and the revelations of evil. Those are foreshadowing for revelations of greatness.
LogynnParticipantFor two days in a row the morning lesson seems to be about one extremely simple concept that everyone has experience doing, but there are so many questions about it that I wonder if I’m completely missing the point.
Rav seems to be saying that we transition to a reality where we are our intention instead of our body, and in that reality we only want the friend to receive, and we have nothing of our own, and we are satisfied with that, and enjoy from the unfolding of bestowal between the Creator and the friends.
This sounds exactly like watching a movie. I forget myself completely. I don’t have a body. I don’t need anything. I’m not even there. There’s just a story unfolding, and all I care about is what I want to see happen for those characters, and what internality will be revealed in the meaning in that story. And the meaning there… the hochma… always feels incredible. They’re the most incredible feelings you can feel in this world, bigger and more complex than anything you can have in your own life.
Everyone has experienced that.
Am I missing something more complex, difficult, or paradoxical that I need to watch them again to understand why the students are so confounded by this?
August 11, 2026 at 5:43 pm EDT in reply to: Get your questions answered by a KabU instructor. #510527
LogynnParticipant“Two opposites, which compose a singular reality.”
I dig back through the forums sometimes for unsatisfying answers from the past and always find they are tremendous answers much later on. Thank you for assembling this tremendous ongoing archive personally for each of us. Each topic keeps becoming the present topic over and over.
LogynnParticipantFrom the morning lesson:
“Question (Petah Tikva Center): (51:57) Where is the root of hatred?
M. Laitman: The root of hatred is the shattering of the screen. The screen was broken, and there was no unity. Everyone only feels their own will to receive, and the will to receive that is different from the person feels as foreign, and that’s the root of hatred. What does it mean? Well, there are many degrees to that. I love myself, and I only care about myself, because that’s my necessity”
Is this meant to imply that the only reason we can’t feel the others as ourselves, or their vessels as ours, is because we don’t want to?
If I obtain a screen I should begin to be able to sense the others as myself again?
I have read that the connection between us is the Creator and only He can form it. Does this mean the substance of the screen, the connection, what makes Kedusha… they are the Creator? Or they are us?
Or is this the overlapping quality that’s part both?
LogynnParticipantThat is how the last ten years felt. Regretting the shattered state and being grateful to no longer overlook the problem. Thanks for the explanation.
LogynnParticipantThe “Lamentations” had no comment, lesson or description with it this morning. Can you say anything about the purpose of it or how it’s used in the work?
- AuthorReplies

