Forum Replies Created

Viewing 6 replies - 1 through 6 (of 145 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • in reply to: Ask Anything #508780
    Logynn
    Participant

    That is how the last ten years felt. Regretting the shattered state and being grateful to no longer overlook the problem. Thanks for the explanation.

    in reply to: Ask Anything #508699
    Logynn
    Participant

    The “Lamentations” had no comment, lesson or description with it this morning. Can you say anything about the purpose of it or how it’s used in the work?

    in reply to: Ask Anything #508571
    Logynn
    Participant

    In the text for the morning lesson this morning “What Does It Mean that the Right Must Be Greater then the Left, in the Work?” it says a couple times that the left line is how new souls are created.

    How is that so? Is it that unique new lacks are discovered? What is a soul in this context?

    in reply to: Get your questions answered by a KabU instructor. #506780
    Logynn
    Participant

    So would a “vessel” of reception not really be a vessel at all, but more like a sieve that can only sense something passing through it?

    Also, I am listening to the morning lesson and Rav mentions that Pharaoh and the Creator can only be together if they are connected by a screen. Which makes it sound more like a complex adapter type structure creating the relation between the two. Not a simple barrier? Is this why a screen is sometimes described as having. coarseness, thickness or hardness? It’s not a simple threshold?

    in reply to: Get your questions answered by a KabU instructor. #505566
    Logynn
    Participant

    I am not sure what page because it’s an audio file (but I think somewhere around page 100) in The Science of Kabbalah he mentions that a kli can only have one desire. So the kli is divided in two, to accommodate the version of that desire that’s in bestowal and also the one for reception. This way it can have two in the same partzuf. This seems to imply that those diagrams of the partzuf are showing that the rosh has a desire (to bestow) and the guf has the same desire but with the intent to receive. I have never seen it described this way.

    Also, does this mean that the vessels of bestowal are the roshes (roshim?) and the vessels of reception are the gufs? It’s not that they are completely other kelim? Just opposing parts of the same kelim?

    in reply to: Ask Anything #505504
    Logynn
    Participant

    where is it in The Study of the Ten Sefirot that we can read about the different relations above and below the Parsa, please? thanks.

Viewing 6 replies - 1 through 6 (of 145 total)