Forum Replies Created
- Replies
Hi, to make my question more precise, what I tried to ask is if „life“ as a learning environment is constructed in a way that through our thoughts/feelings/actions /encounters we are exposed to different „states“. So that the purpose of life would not be about what we do / achieve in life, but how we scrutinize, develop and learn to deal with these states. Does that make sense at all? I relate those states to disconnection versus connection, ego versus love of friends.. and finally learning to bestow. I am not sure if I manage to find the right words here, because what I call a „state“ is a sensation that is based a lot on that very first steps in the group work, and even though I am just a beginner, it left an amazing and deep impression. Still, I am not sure if this strong feeling of love, of connection, of home in the work is just grace „from above, like an incentive, or whether this is the right „state“ to look out for (and whether one should be attentive for this at all).
Hi, I understand life is like a „learning environment“ for the soul. And I feel it is all about the states we go through, and less our feelings /thoughts/ actions which create these states. Is that correct? And how to work with these different states? How do we evaluate them and how do we evaluate the change they bring within us? They currently impress me very much, especially as they seem to be shifting so much. Still, of course, outwardly life goes on as usual.
I understand and feel the power of love and connection is amazing. But how about the people surrounding us that are not there, feel the darkness, feel the deficiency, but cannot wriggle out of their egos to take those steps needed (not the „happy egoists“, but rather the lost ones that are caught in a battle with their ego)? Itś so sad to feel their suffering, and I feel itś heartbreaking to just walk by and leave them. Can we see them as friends, can we pray for them? And how? Thank you 🙂
Thank you Gianni, that is incredibly helpful. I am looking so forward to start working in a ten, and equally, to read the texts with this other intention. I was happy to relate to them as I did, but in fact, this other approach is making the work a lot more authentic and easier for me. And I will try to form my question, much as I can, with this in mind as well. ❤️
Thank you really a lot for these explanations and sorry that I get back to it once more (and itś the last „add on question“ on this topic, promised). The only reason that I am asking those questions, and I dońt know how it is for others, is that I feel whenever I read something, it does something, but I dońt know what it does, how it works, and who I am. However at the same time. I get all these images of how things intertwine and connect (which is probably just because I am a very visual person). And feeling that insecurity, even the idea to connect about this with others, feels like fooling around without taking responsibility for what I am doing. So with every „did I get that right“, I understand I miss the essential points, because I dońt have the vessels to understand. But basically that means I need to cut off any attempts to understand, ignore those images my mind creates as I read, and work with the idea that I have nothing to give when I connect – except my love and dedication and wish for others to understand more than I do. Is it supposed to be like that?
Thatś a challenging answer:-)In a way it makes me happy, because then that makes reading quite easy… so if I dońt understand, Iĺl just leave it there… Íd like to write, „no problem there“, especially while being just a beginner. However, unfortunately, our mind DOES create images and questions all the time. So if the answer to all that is „you cannot imagine that, dońt even try, the purpose of reading is just connection and drawing the light“… (and I can well imagine it to be like that.. so I dońt even have an issue there…except that it will frustrate my ego)… then why during the morning lessons, so many questions are asked? Why not read in silence and focus just only on connection? Or better asked: what questions should be asked at all?
