The classic parent/child analogy where the child has no grasp on why the parent wants to seemingly “cause harm” to the child’s well-being when trying to educate and develop them because the child doesn’t, and can’t, see the entire picture. Rabash also gives an example about a father and child walking down the street and everyone hears and sees the child screaming at the father to give him what he wants. Everyone approaches and asks, “why don’t you just do as he says and he’ll stop?”, father replies, “he wants to sooth an itch by scratching his eye with a needle” — illustrating that the child doesn’t know he’s causing harm and it’s the father’s responsibility to stop it.

We reached connection on a certain level, needed to then be mixed with other desires (nations), thus we fell. But now we need to rise back to connection with all that coarseness (aviut). Only then it will be the level of connection that can bring the revelation of the Creator on the level of the Light of Yechida. Do we need to also lay some bricks according to the architecture of the desire we discover in that connection? That’s a question. But before this connection we won’t even know how to build it correctly.

Another dimension, more solid, more real.

No. But you also don’t need to focus on which forces. The general Upper Light that corrects the desire corrects exactly whatever needs correction.

something like a prayer, mantra, a chapter of zohar

Hey, exactly and well also important to ask “why?” and more precisely, “who do I want to cause pleasure by receiving?”