- This topic has 2,513 replies, 143 voices, and was last updated 1 day, 15 hours ago by
.
- Replies
I understand and feel the power of love and connection is amazing. But how about the people surrounding us that are not there, feel the darkness, feel the deficiency, but cannot wriggle out of their egos to take those steps needed (not the „happy egoists“, but rather the lost ones that are caught in a battle with their ego)? Itś so sad to feel their suffering, and I feel itś heartbreaking to just walk by and leave them. Can we see them as friends, can we pray for them? And how? Thank you 🙂
Hi, so, Sorry, but just two more questions… what does it mean when itś said that a female (like Sarah or Rebecca or else) was infertile for a specific time… Does that mean that in the specific constellation of forces that is described (like Abraham with Sarah oder Isaac with Rebecca), the will to receive is blocked during this „time or constellation of intertility“, and a specific desire is held back and cannot been „born“ unless there is a certain development made?
And with all the processes and forces that are described in the Thorah Portions, are they subsequently following each other, or do they work in us in parallel strings, and go through cycles again and again… ? So… compared to a human, is it more like aging (there is a beginning, and then certain development, certain stages, and a final end) or is it like the day-to-day way functions… like the circadianic rhythm of hormones, or the way the liver processes toxins or the million other things that happen over and over again? Or is it both? (Because that at least is how our body works?)
I don’t want to be too smart here, because it won’t help. I’m supposed to read such texts for the Reforming Light to work. And to whatever extent I’ll taxonomize everything and understand, when I reach it, I’ll find that I didn’t imagine even one thing correctly. Except for the Light operating, and awakening in a person those vessels that are talked about there, nothing will help. Except that I can clog students with some extra knowledge that can actually lengthen their path.
Thatś a challenging answer:-)In a way it makes me happy, because then that makes reading quite easy… so if I dońt understand, Iĺl just leave it there… Íd like to write, „no problem there“, especially while being just a beginner. However, unfortunately, our mind DOES create images and questions all the time. So if the answer to all that is „you cannot imagine that, dońt even try, the purpose of reading is just connection and drawing the light“… (and I can well imagine it to be like that.. so I dońt even have an issue there…except that it will frustrate my ego)… then why during the morning lessons, so many questions are asked? Why not read in silence and focus just only on connection? Or better asked: what questions should be asked at all?
Questions should be about the connection, to help the friends connect and connect to the Light, and whatever can tie us all more closely to what we’re studying.
Here, though, you can ask anything; but I won’t answer unless it’s going to help, according to my definition of help – and I don’t mind if students are not exactly satisfied right now. The extreme of this is Rabash, who was pleased when friends would come out of his lesson empty. He wanted the Kli. It’s with the Kli that you reveal. Not when it’s stuffed with all the knowledge one might be curious about.
Thank you really a lot for these explanations and sorry that I get back to it once more (and itś the last „add on question“ on this topic, promised). The only reason that I am asking those questions, and I dońt know how it is for others, is that I feel whenever I read something, it does something, but I dońt know what it does, how it works, and who I am. However at the same time. I get all these images of how things intertwine and connect (which is probably just because I am a very visual person). And feeling that insecurity, even the idea to connect about this with others, feels like fooling around without taking responsibility for what I am doing. So with every „did I get that right“, I understand I miss the essential points, because I dońt have the vessels to understand. But basically that means I need to cut off any attempts to understand, ignore those images my mind creates as I read, and work with the idea that I have nothing to give when I connect – except my love and dedication and wish for others to understand more than I do. Is it supposed to be like that?
Thank you Gianni, that is incredibly helpful. I am looking so forward to start working in a ten, and equally, to read the texts with this other intention. I was happy to relate to them as I did, but in fact, this other approach is making the work a lot more authentic and easier for me. And I will try to form my question, much as I can, with this in mind as well. ❤️
Hi, there is another question that I am not getting out of my mind. The way I understand it, our emotions, and even thoughts are kind of „operated“, by our desires, from above… and the freedom we have is how, during experiencing all we do, we direct our intention. Is that correct? And then… with all the pain that people inflict upon themselves or others, I understand itś basically the same, is that correct? Now, what is the point of „freedom“ , the momentum of choice there?
And how does that apply to all the self-hatred people show? Take self-harming issues or like people who are treating their bodies in a harmful way or treating themselves with disrespect. I mean, basically thatś happening everywhere. What creates that immense lack of self-love? Why do people hate themselves in terms of spirituality?Thinking of desires, I understand, why people may hate others…but how does a desire hate itself? . Why would a desire try to destroy the body and mind itś using, or be dysfunctional? An what is the lesson to learn? (I am not talking about psychodynamics, I know it´s complex, but as to the spiritual purpose of it, I feel a bit lost to understand).
It only seems that way, that people don’t love themselves enough. It’s precisely intense self-love in the moment, but for me, in the desire I am right now, to receive maximally, and not to care for some future state, someone’s predictions about what might be good later or something like that. Now, exactly in this later, is the ego, the Klipa that gives me this sense of time, that I can always do what I need to do, later. It’s program is to ensure I’m eaten by worms before I attain spirituality, one day at a time, one moment at a time, until the dirt piles are thrown on my coffin. For now, I’m fine, busied with this and that. Will tomorrow be different? It’ll be the same, for different reasons.
Hi Gianni, I have got a question about what we actually are. The way I understood it, we are all desires, clothing in bodies for a lifetime, over and over again, for us to learn and develop. So, do we consist of just one desire, that we need to develop throughout all corrections, like one branch that needs to find its way back to the root, or is it more like we are a rope that consists of many strings, each string a desire, and we have to correct all the different desires?
I don’t know how old you are, but if you met yourself 20 years ago, 30 years ago…or when you’re 90 and look back on everything, how much do you think you’ll identify with the girl you were at age 5, 15, 35? I know what you want to ask, but you see that even in the span of this life, many different desires sit in the drivers seat for a time.
Are there any BB information channels, online communites or 10s that exist outside of the Meta (WhatsApp & Facebook) ecosystem ?
I am currently reading „disclosing a portion“. Itś so intriguing to get a first insight into the forces behind the names :-))) Anyways, just a small question: Hagar and Ishmael, do they belong to the left line? Thatś how understood it… however, in the book, I find it a bit confusing, so I thought I better ask (I don`t want to get left and right mixed up right at the beginning:-))
This is one passage: („Abraham has the Klipa (shell/peel) of the right, Hagar and Ishmael, and the Klipa of the left, Isaac and Esau, with whom we attain the middle line, Jacob, at the conclusion of the process of correction“)
And this is the other passage („To scrutinize the desire called “Isaac,” we must first remove the desire with which we cannot work and sort it with another female, with Hagar, from whom comes Ishmael, the Klipa (shell/peel) of the right.“)
Both the Right Line and the Left Line have their own Klipa. So, there’s the Klipa of the Right Line, and the Klipa of the Left Line. There is a corrupt form of each side, and a correct form.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.