New Home › Forums › Course Forums › Kabbalah Revealed Interactive – Part 1 › Week 1 › Discuss › Ask anything about week 1 lesson and materials and get an answer from a senior Kabbalah instructor.
- This topic has 1,475 replies, 568 voices, and was last updated 10 hours, 20 minutes ago by
Albert – KabU Instructor.
- April 21, 2020 at 6:26 pm EDT #28785

Tony Kosinec- KabU InstructorModeratorAsk anything about week 1 lesson and materials and get an answer from a senior Kabbalah instructor.
- AuthorReplies
- May 4, 2025 at 10:01 pm EDT #436172
Anita KinoshitaParticipantWhat gives Kabbalah authority if the contents are truly unverifiable?
- May 5, 2025 at 11:24 am EDT #436270
Albert – KabU InstructorModeratorHi Anita,
Kabbalah is a science. The Kabbalists are the scientists of Kabbalah. Everything we know is based on their research. This is similar to how other sciences work. The Kabbalists are those researchers that have performed a certain experiment and reached a certain result: the correction of our nature, the revelation of the Creator, the force of bestowal, etc. So if we are to replicate their experiment, to follow their procedures we should reach the same results.
But if a person is not yet on the degree of a Kabbalist, how does he relate to everything he’s learning? Like to any other science. For example, when I read a physics textbook, I see different formulas and experiments that research our reality. If I’m reading this textbook in 8th grade, then I have no choice but to accept the things written there since they come from a credible source. If I’m reading this textbook in college, I’m already given some tools with which I can measure and verify some of these things for myself. And yet there are some concepts that are so advanced, that I have no way to verify them until I become a physicist myself and get access to all the tools that will help me research these things.
Same with us here. There are some things I can verify for myself even when I’m just starting in the fundamentals of this wisdom, and then there are things that I can verify only when I myself have reached attainment.
Check out this blog post from Rav Laitman for more details: https://laitman.com/2011/01/kabbalah-and-other-sciences-philosophy-and-religion/
Albert @ KabU
- May 5, 2025 at 4:03 pm EDT #436309
Anita KinoshitaParticipantThank you for that explanation and shared resource. Will we be discussing the tools that we can use to verify these truths for ourselves in this course? Or is this course mostly similar to that 8th grade textbook that describes the science?
- May 5, 2025 at 4:43 pm EDT #436315
Albert – KabU InstructorModeratorHi Anita,
The fundamental and intermediate semesters are mostly informative courses. The practical application of what we’re learning will be applied in the advanced semesters.
Albert @ KabU
- April 26, 2025 at 4:20 pm EDT #435265
TraceyParticipantWhat did it mean “you now understand and know how to use the readings of the managerial even if you don’t understand it I must have missed that key part in session one there is no one besides him ……
- April 27, 2025 at 12:22 am EDT #435291
Albert – KabU InstructorModeratorHi Tracey,
I don’t understand the question, please provide the link and time stamp to what you are referencing.
Albert @ KabU
- This reply was modified 10 months, 1 week ago by
Albert - KabU Instructor.
- This reply was modified 10 months, 1 week ago by
- April 25, 2025 at 10:25 am EDT #435179
Al
ParticipantAfter seeing the video I have 2 main questions:
1. why or how do we descend from the reality into our world? was that a punishment?
2. I would like to know more about the 125 steps
- April 25, 2025 at 11:10 am EDT #435181
Albert – KabU InstructorModeratorHi Al,
1. We were created in the state of perfection, in complete adhesion with the Creator. (Baal HaSulam describes this in the article Introduction to the book of Zohar). But this was an unconscious state, like a baby in its mother’s womb. So we necessarily had to come to the complete opposite state, to lose that state of perfection, in order to once again reach it, but this time consciously.
And the fact that we had to lose this state is not something bad, but it’s a necessary part of our development. It’s just like with kids. We don’t just give them a completed jigsaw puzzle. On the contrary we take it and break it down into many pieces. Then in the process of them putting it together, they grow and develop. Same with us, this process of losing that state is a necessary part of our further growth and development.
This process also adds to us a certain level of freedom, without which, we would be no different than machines, or robots, that were programmed to act a certain way and they just carry out this inner script. Instead, we were programmed one way, and we rise above this inner programming, become independent of it, and then develop our own desire to advance towards this goal.
Check out this blog post from Rav Laitman for more details: https://laitman.com/2014/01/from-perfection-to-perfection/
2. The number 125 comes from the structure of the upper worlds. This structure is just a division of the spiritual desire that we need to correct into sefirot, partzufim, and worlds.
The most basic division of the desire is 1 Sefira. 5 Sefirot compose 1 partzuf. 5 Partzufim compose 1 world. There are 5 worlds in total. So 5 worlds each with 5 partzufim each with 5 sefirot equals 125 (5x5x5) steps on the spiritual ladder, or in other words corrections that need to be performed on the desire.
In the book Kabbalah for the Student, there’s an article called Foreword to the Preface to the Wisdom of Kabbalah which lists these 125 steps in the language of sefirot/partzufim/olamot(worlds). For now, these are just technical terms for us, but in the future lessons we’ll dive deeper into these things and learn how to feel and experience them.
In simpler words, the 125 steps represent the difference between us and the Creator. The Creator is a desire to bestow and we are the desire to receive. Adapting our desire to receive to work in order to bestow takes 125 steps. So to the extent that we correct our nature, make it similar to the Creator’s nature, to that extent we’re “climbing” this ladder.
In other words, ascending or descending this ladder is not a physical action, but rather depends on how much we’re similar to the Creator’s quality of bestowal (ascending) or less similar to it and more egoistic (descending).
All of this operates according to the law of equivalence of form. Check out this blog post from Rav Laitman for more details:
https://laitman.com/2013/04/everything-is-attained-by-the-equivalence-of-form/
Albert @ KabU
- This reply was modified 10 months, 1 week ago by
Albert - KabU Instructor.
- This reply was modified 10 months, 1 week ago by
- April 23, 2025 at 6:16 pm EDT #434794
ParkParticipantHello. I’m wondering if there will be instruction to use any of the books that was recommended to supplement this course.
- April 23, 2025 at 6:36 pm EDT #434797
Albert – KabU InstructorModeratorHi Park,
Each weekly lesson has recommended reading materials from the course books. Here is the link for week 1.
Furthermore, it’s recommended to just read through Kabbalah Revealed from beginning to end. After that, you can also read through Attaining the Worlds Beyond.
As for Kabbalah For the Student, this is a textbook of primary sources, it can be very difficult to read on your own. We’ll go through those articles together throughout the semesters.
Albert @ KabU
- April 24, 2025 at 1:46 pm EDT #434848
ParkParticipantThank you Albert. I appreciate your response. I’m wondering, is there a link you may be able to share pertaining to the recommended readings for each week? Also, does the course notify us when we have completed a week?
I’m very excited about the readings. It’s why I asked. Can’t wait to dig in!
- April 24, 2025 at 2:44 pm EDT #434850
Albert – KabU InstructorModeratorHi Park,
Each week has its own link for the recommended readings. You can find them in the left-hand navigation bar.
If you completed a week, there is a check mark in all the activities of that week, also found in the left-hand navigation bar.
Here’s a screenshot example:

Albert @ KabU
- May 1, 2025 at 9:35 pm EDT #435937
ParkParticipantThank you! I didn’t notice it in my mobile browser.
- April 21, 2025 at 12:28 pm EDT #434312
Aleta
ParticipantPlease help me to understand <i>Lo Lishma ( not for Her sake ). </i>
Thank you.
- May 1, 2025 at 9:33 pm EDT #435936
ParkParticipant.
- April 21, 2025 at 3:16 pm EDT #434328
Albert – KabU InstructorModeratorHi Aleta,
Lo Lishma and Lishma refers to our intention, the reason for why we’re studying Kabbalah. Lo Lishma means that we aspire to spirituality egoistically, for our own sake. While Lishma is when the light corrects our initial egoistic aspiration and makes it operate purely in the direction of bestowal, for the sake of the entire system.
Check out this blog post from Rav Laitman for more details: https://laitman.com/2011/07/lo-lishma-having-something-to-correct/
Albert @ KabU
- April 21, 2025 at 12:24 pm EDT #434311
Aleta
ParticipantThere are many variations of the word/name Adam in the readings. Please explain the varied use and meanings. Thank you.
- April 21, 2025 at 3:07 pm EDT #434327
Albert – KabU InstructorModeratorHi Aleta,
Adam is Hebrew for man or person, it could also be the name of a person.
Adam Kadmon, which translates to: primordial man, is part of the system of worlds. It is the first form of the desire to receive that became similar to the Creator, but it operates in a different way then the rest of the system, so it’s called primordial.
Adam HaRishon, which translates to: the first man, is the active part within the system of worlds. This is similar to how you have planet Earth and you have people or those that inhabit the planet.
So Adam Kadmon is part of the system of worlds, while Adam HaRishon is the active part within that system.
Check out this blog post from Rav Laitman for more details: https://laitman.com/2014/05/the-human-is-the-innermost-part-in-the-system-of-worlds/
Albert @ KabU
- AuthorReplies
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.


