New Home › Forums › Course Forums › Perceiving Reality Course › 1. The Essence of Kabbalah › What have you discovered about Kabbalah that was new to you?
- This topic has 341 replies, 319 voices, and was last updated 1 month ago by Amy.
- May 4, 2020 at 9:58 am EDT #31222
Tony Kosinec- KabU InstructorModeratorWhat have you discovered about Kabbalah that was new to you?
- AuthorReplies
- July 2, 2022 at 10:32 am EDT #293056philipParticipant
Having spent years ‘looking for answers’ – Christianity / Buddhism / Occultism – I have at last found where the former have been leading me over these past 76 years. Thank you for your guidance. Hopefully later I may be able to carry the candle for someone else.
- June 25, 2022 at 4:05 am EDT #292495Massimo RoselliParticipant
It’s been almost liberating to hear that Kabbalah has got nothing to do with red strings and healing. The power of the red string was taught to me to such an extent that I ended up believing in it.
- June 18, 2022 at 5:18 am EDT #291933BeverlyParticipant
Nothing about me needs to change except my intentions.
- May 17, 2022 at 4:09 pm EDT #289226SymonParticipant
Everything you have said is new to me, and resonates so deeply with what I have always felt about my reality. Thank you
- May 15, 2022 at 5:10 pm EDT #289052GabrialaParticipant
to love more than you ,, pray if I may say had to change word’s,,, not in your needs or won’t but to truly appreciate and ask for gidence for yourself to help others
- May 15, 2022 at 2:28 pm EDT #289031MargaretParticipant
What was new to me was more what Kabbalah is not. Mostly, I’ve been very happy to learn that Kabbalah is not a religion and does not anthropomorphize Source, something I’ve always had issues with when dealing with most religions and one of the reasons I have always been drawn to philosophical Taoism — as soon as you “name” Source (i.e. make it anthropocentric in any way), you are no longer talking about the true Source (Tao) but really just layering it with something comfortable and relatable, which can lead to only having a surface, intellectual understanding of something so much greater that should be intuited and felt, rather than intellectualized.
- AuthorReplies
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.