Forum Replies Created
- Replies
When we say “Creator” – is here also the Sitra Achra included? Yes, Shamati 1 says we shouldn’t think there would be something like Sitra Achra, that would be a heresy and a transgression, although there is much described and said in the sages about this. So, we say “Creator” with an eye-wink, meaning, the Creator is also the “bad” what is not suppossed to exist and we’re not suppossed to admit? And how can we comee to Truth and to bestowal, if we do like described?
“(…) is not up to us to figure the entire thing out. It’s through efforts that we attract this correcting light, the desire to understand what those things are, to work towards them. The work is full of mistakes, without them there we couldn’t be any achievement at all. The mistake shows what is not, what is not, what is not – and reveals what it is. And when it happens, as it happens, the heart knows – because the heart never lies. But we have to be able to tell the difference between heart and mind, they’re not the same thing. Though the mind tries to diguise itself as the heart (…)” (by the Creator through a conduite soul of KabU, on 23rd November 2025, of which should exist more among us) L’Chaim 🙏
Gianni, does the tree of knowledge indeed have 11 Sefirot through the ‘Daat’? Is the tree of knowledge the realm of Sitra Achra, which have a domination over the tree of life? I’m watching right now your last session of SMWF and some previous info about these issues seem to emerge together arising these questions. Also: roughly exactly expressed: ‘Bina clothed in Malchut is the worst state’ – how can Bina liberate herself from this state!? Consider that she prays for the liberation like crazy and counters and adjusts all thoughts and deeds the best she can according to the teachings in order to be on ‘the right side’. Is urgent! Thank you!
Entangled particles are reacting similarly no matter of their distance and consciousness, this is what they say in new science. Is it always similarity or can it be also oppositeness according to Kabbalah? That they react contrary to one another?
And is it possible, that souls do the work at the place of other souls? And if yes, where can this be seen in the process described in Pticha?
We’re taught – not only in Kabbalah but also through the new science lately – that the others are oneself whom we don’t know yet or perceive. Sometimes we’re in tens together with friends whose qualities are so different of ourselves, that we only can wonder ‘how is this me!?’, and there is no cultural cluster within our whole kli, where are no challenges and even brutalities in tens. So: can it be that one gets a ten whose members are really not what oneself is, not even in the opposite form, and can it not be taken like this? That the friends are simply everything what one can never be, and THATS WHY one gets them, and is about to find a place above this condition in order to be anyway together like one, for the sake of the connection? Why should we torment and mutilate ourselves by thinking ‘this is me’ if it is not? Why do we have to consider them ‘oneself’? I feel I didn’t express it well enough and hope you understand what I mean. Why do we not stop tormenting ourselves with qualities which we are not containing pretending they are ours? And simply accept the difference already at the beginning without identifying it first as being ourselves?
