Forum Replies Created
- Replies
1. Is it possible to do the work of correction at the place of another person and she will get/integrate the results of the correction work? if the person is not on the path (corporeal person, but close) and she and her deeds/interactions are part of one’s reshimo?
2. Are there souls who descend in this world and are like delegates working for others, and can in turn delegate the correction results?
Thank you
And when we say “I don’t receive anything more” – what is ment by this? Because then we wouldn’t attend any lesson or meetings with friends, because we would receive. To connect means – also – to receive, is an aspect of connecting. I hear smth and can’t make it unheard, I received it.
When it comes to connection there is the matter of receiving – receiving the other one, and for that openess is needed – which is actually the “giving” – and the intention to receive the other one – otherwise connection cannot be made (side-question: this would be receiving in order to receive connection!? This discernment comes first now writing, was not my intention, but the way is put says also that receiving is the bestowal – this is it, right?)
The (many) intended question(s): How can Keter (GE) from the lower one actually receive at all if it is pure bestowal? The connection between GE of the lower one and AHP of the higher one can be made only if GE receives in order to bestow? What process has the GE or Keter to be gone through so that it can receive? Does Keter contain Malchut, which would enable Keter to receive? And which is the “giving” of Malchut of AHP? The desire/intention for connection? This would mean that the Malchut is corrected in this case, but AHP means per se that it is uncorrected – or not? Is such desire/intention an act of bestowal?
And if Keter/ GE would feel shame – then it won’t be a true Keter/GE, right? That means that “in order to bestow” is stable there, incorporated?
This came up on basis of Shamati 17 yesterday and couldn’t ask completely. Thank you
I’m reading in the article The Two Great Lights 2, it’s about this passage:
In the beginning, the Nukva was inscribed above, in ZA, in the letters of the holy name HaVaYaH, in the fourth letter of the name, for the Nukva was the bottom Hey of HaVaYaH when she was on the same degree with ZA. Afterward, she diminished herself into being called by the name Elokim.
I remember somewhere in the creation story, there was said “let us make…” – can you tell me please where I can find that text, in order not to guess? Were 3 Elokims who made the world? If yes, then it seems like the deception (also projection, and even concealment?) began earlier than the one of the serpent. Adam was made whole, and then there came the split by making Eve, for the reason Adam shouldn’t be “alone”, but he wasn’t, he was the created being the Creator wanted him to be in order to receive the His love He wanted to share. That split made Adam alone and actually separated him from the Creator and from receiving the love – what was actually the oposite of what God wanted. And then I had the thought that a light particle is both, light and matter, but it acts like matter trough… Were the Elokim – which are below the actual Creator – corrupted calling themselves Creator? Is THIS the deception of which we have to liberate us from?
Because I don’t wanna pray to the top management, my prayers are for the CEO…
