Forum Replies Created
- AuthorReplies
- March 25, 2026 at 4:59 am EDT in reply to: Preparation Question: What is freedom and how, by the help of the Reforming Light, can we acquire it? #491836
Farzin
ParticipantFreedom in this world, to me, means having, doing, and enjoying what you want and desire. As I was created to receive, I found it bizarre to be created to receive yet always be envious of what I don’t have.
How can the light help? Either by eliminating the desires, changing them, or bestowing on me what I desire.
March 13, 2026 at 9:51 pm EDT in reply to: Ask anything about week 5 lesson and materials and get an answer from a senior Kabbalah instructor. #488431Farzin
ParticipantThanks for the response. I read what you said in Rav Laitman, too:
“Similarly, we need to clarify the conditions under which we will be able to pull the maximum Light that Reforms. And we need not just to place ourselves under its influence, but to pull it to ourselves. After all, here everything depends on how strongly I want the Light to come and affect me.
And one needs to think about this all day: How can I hold myself in the correct thought and desire; what needs to control my heart and mind in order to invite the influence of the Light?”
One more clarification, please: the cause and effect in this case doesn’t follow the corporeal laws. Does it? For example, just thinking and dreaming about being rich every minute has never made anyone rich. You may dream all you want, but you also need to take some form of action to gradually get there. Starting to receive the Light by reading Kabbalistic texts because there is a desire to receive the Light is like starting to get rich through a burning desire and reading different books, such as “Think and Grow Rich”, etc., without any action. So, what’s the verdict here? Are the cause-and-effect laws in Kabbalah different, or are they similar to corporeality and require some action? If so, what’s the action? I hope I could get the message across.
March 13, 2026 at 9:41 am EDT in reply to: Ask anything about week 5 lesson and materials and get an answer from a senior Kabbalah instructor. #488398Farzin
ParticipantHi. I have a few questions about this week’s content. In the related material, I learned about the language of roots and branches. According to this, and what is clarified in the book ” Kabbalah for Students”, as long as we are in the world of branches, we never attain the spiritual meaning of their roots. The roots are the means by which Kabbalists exchange and discuss spiritual concepts among themselves. There is no way to understand the hidden meaning no matter how hard you try. You’ll understand, apparently, only with help from above and the attainment process. So, why is it emphasized, many times, that reading the authentic Kabbalah books, which are only understood by us in their corporeal form, will help with attainment? Is it like magic (Kabbalah is not magic) or by dedicating your time and commitment to reading something you won’t understand until the creator considers me worthy and give me something out of pity or as a reward for my desire?
Second question is about the groups of ten. As we are hard wired to receive, every attempt made to get beyond the Masach, is based on the will to receive. The intention is originally receiving the “will to bestow” and being equivalent to the Creator in form. Every attempt we make in this journey is to become or “receive” the creator’s form. The intention is to receive in order to give. The fact that we will give doesn’t eliminate the very first intention that is “to receive” that quality. How does it work and how this paradox can be explained?
Farzin
ParticipantHonestly, the further I go, the more confused I become. I understand the figurative meaning of the nice words here and there. I understand that the entire reality, perceived as good or evil are the actions of the creator. So, theoretically, everything is good as everything is his action or thoughts/plans. But in everyday life, good is good and bad is bad. No matter how I interpret the pain on paper, pain always hurts.
I have mixed thoughts. Why did the creator create us in the first place, on this plane, not somewhere else? Why did he ever need this creation, and then send us down 125 steps just to crawl back up where we were?
Why the need or will to bestow so that a receiver is required? Why are the numbers and stages as they are? Why are Kabbalah books recommended when it is explicitly stressed that, as long as we are in the branches level, we will never understand the roots up there and their intended meanings?  He is all good, all giving, all loving, he is all – so far nothing different from religion. Said by those who attained. If I attain, I’ll s see; if not, I won’t, no matter how many times I read the book cover to cover.
March 12, 2026 at 4:19 am EDT in reply to: What was my best experience from the previous course? What do I expect from this course? #488291Farzin
ParticipantWell. What I got from the previous course was that I cannot understand the root meaning of the branches in this dimension, no matter how many times I read the books and authentic resources. Unless I am being bestowed the capacity/ability to have a glimpse of the upper worlds and the roots there, I’ll get nowhere. I am a bit confused, but waiting hopefully as things may unfold in future lessons.
March 1, 2026 at 3:25 am EST in reply to: Preparation Question: How can we get in touch with the upper force and act with it mutually? #484176Farzin
Participantbased on what I have learned so far is by the equivalence of form – becoming like the creator even 1%. This clip however says by getting in touch and interacting with the forces of the nature. Or seeing the world(s) and the creation with the thoughts resonating with the creator’s. what baffles me though is ‘how’?
As creatures, we are created to receive. Even if I wanted to become like the creator but updating the software to “to receive in order to give” I am still trying to receive. When I am created to be the receiver, how can I ever be resonating with be equivalent to the form of bestowal? I hope moving on I get answer and clearer perspective.
- AuthorReplies

