Forum Replies Created
- AuthorReplies
- February 17, 2025 at 8:37 am EST in reply to: If you wanted to show the Upper Force that you truly would like to be in contact with it, how would you do so? #426551
ClaraParticipantI’ll become very quiet and I would focus my whole atention with all power I have on it, on the Upper light. I’ll be aware of what is going on between us in this setting in these moments and I will put all my desire to contact it in that, what is flowing between us, or better said from me to it.
February 15, 2025 at 6:29 pm EST in reply to: In your own words, what is the purpose of this course of study? What do you hope to attain? #426381
ClaraParticipantTo come closer to discovering my ‘coordinates’ so that I can support friends and the purpose of Creation properly
February 15, 2025 at 5:33 pm EST in reply to: A question for you before we get started: Why do you think it was decided that all people would be born lacking the tool of spiritual perception? #426374
ClaraParticipantThat the separation is accomplished and secured and by that providing conditions for growth of the desire
February 15, 2025 at 3:45 pm EST in reply to: Get your questions answered by a KabU instructor. #426366
ClaraParticipantRegarding the last video in this digital order: are we – people and desires to receive – actually descending or ascending? And regarding phase 4 – does it mean that for example when we take off the body, or as we achieve that state of Malchut, we are both in one? Malchut and Keter?
ClaraParticipantHello Gianni, an old question I haven’t clarified until today:
“‘the left rejects and the right adducts’, meaning that which the left rejects is considered correction” – how is this ment? The left rejects smth that is already correct(ed)? Or does that what is rejected needs to be corrected?
Thank you
ClaraParticipantWho or what is the Creator? We read in the TES Questions table from Baal HaSulam following:
11. Creator (Part 1, Inner Observation, 18)
The name Creator relates solely to the actual innovation, meaning the “existence from absence,” which is the substance of the Kelim, defined as the “will to receive” in every essence. It was necessarily absent from Himself prior to creation.
1. When the question is about the Creator – why is the answer depicting the will to receive?
2. Is the Creator the will to receive!?
3. If it is about emphasizing the aspect of “relating” – why does the answer anyway relate to the will to receive instead of to the Creator?
Unfortunately I missed the Grad Class, this question being a question for the best fit in Mike, but because it really burns at time, I put it here, thanks Gianni. How do YOU see it!?
- AuthorReplies

