Forum Replies Created

Viewing 6 replies - 463 through 468 (of 2,463 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • in reply to: Ask Anything #466662

    That’s how it is written. Also, Adam HaRishon we can say had no choice: the shattering had to happen. Also,us. If we look through the right lens, we’d see there aren’t even humans here, but animals who follow their every instinct and only dream up a narrative about how they’re debating, deciding. But we could wash off that dream from the matter and we’d see that they do everything they do, anyway, without any of their decisions. Their decisions come after the impulses arise in them, and then depending on the more powerful signal, that’s the option they go with. But the weaker and stronger signals were juxtaposed on purpose, to lend the illusion of choice, while all along it is known what you are, what impulses were given, and thus, what you’ll decide. So, too, for every single human and the rest of the animal kingdom of which we’re still parts, because we, in this governance, have not risen to a level that is beyond animals. Rather all is done by the Creator.

    Except that we were given the wisdom of Kabbalah and how much am I realizing at least what I know to do, in every moment? Or is it that I find that it is important, but other things are more important most of the time? So, until it will be important enough it turns out that it’s not important enough. Meaning, yes, I suffer but I’m ok with continuing to suffer a while longer.

    in reply to: Ask Anything #466542

    It is written that Malchut of the Four Phases decides on the Tzimzum [restriction]. It’s called an ‘adornment,’ as if not entirely necessary. And the Creator pushes Malchut to receive, but as the ‘guest’ Malchut refuses the entreaties of the Host. However, “a decision of the Upper becomes a law for the lower.” Moreover, I heard in the lesson from Rav Laitman just now, “Every moment he is giving you exercises and you couldn’t care less about them – that’s why you are staying as you are – you don’t want to see his relation to you and establish your relation back to him.” Therefore, all our suffering is because we’re willing to have tomorrow be as today was, and so on.

    in reply to: Ask Anything #466534

    No, friends on the path are friends on the path. But the work that really counts is toward the friends in your ten.

    in reply to: Ask Anything #466533

    No, the Surrounding Light could not be received in that vessel, which is why it had to remain outside. It’s not about making room for it, it’s that that Surrounding Light is of such quality in relation to the coarseness and the Screen that if it enters the vessel, it will be received in order to receive.

    in reply to: Ask Anything #466256

    Ptchia doesn’t talk about us, our process to return to the spiritual state, but about the spiritual world itself. It barely mentions Adam HaRishon.

    We’re after its breaking. We all affect each other now, across time and space. We don’t have to be in equivalence of form. We’re in egoistic compatibility and therefore we’re in this world together and we’re all connected in an egoistic system.

    in reply to: Ask Anything #466148

    It seems Rabash wants us to check if, with respect to the friends, we judge them from within reason, below reason, or above reason. We need to start measuring to what extent we can see them above reason. I think the example is clear.

Viewing 6 replies - 463 through 468 (of 2,463 total)