Forum Replies Created
- Replies
We see the sorrow and longing in this world, and we understand what it is for and the beauty it creates in us, but at the same time we turn to the Creator and tell Him how tired we are and that it’s time to bring us home.
Examining your relationship with everything in reality, from a rock all the way to a person. Understanding how you objectify it all, and realizing that it is ALL the Creator and you. The way you treat each object, creature and person is who you are in your relationship with the Creator. Then you try to develop a conscientious relationship with every aspect of reality. And where you struggle with that, you ask the Creator for help, and He responds in stunningly subtle and clever ways.
Where it says that the creature shattered and all the pieces fused with all the individual desires contained in each one. . . is that like the idea of a holographic universe, where each unit within that universe is also a representation of the whole?
Is that how Arvut works, that as each universe (person) improves their image of reality, that they are all impacted?
I think in this context you can think of the screen like a goalie.
The top half of the partzuf is able to see the Creator firing off all this goodness at it. And it’s like if it goes in to the goal it’s game over.
But if the top half can redirect those good things back out at the team mates we can keep playing the game. And the point is that we all want to play.
That’s how I think of it anyway.
I was just thinking I should mention that the way I came to this method of the Hindu rituals is that I had horrible anxiety and hyper vigilance. I noticed over time that the trigger seemed to be feeling like I wasn’t doing what I was supposed to be doing. (Probably a side effect of overly strict parenting by extended family.)
So I started all this simply so I could feel, in every moment, like I’m doing what I’m supposed to. And I could stop worrying about it.
Someone from a religious background probably feels the opposite anxiety, and might have to think of it differently.
