[Peter]

Thank you kindly for such detail answer. I am still absorbing it, but a lot I understood.

I would like to ask another question please. I was watching Rav today at the Convention. A question was asked on how to correct a deficiency. And Rav responded with something specific like that the deficiency should be directed towards the group and the Creator may correct that deficiency.

I begin to wonder if what he was saying was something very specific. If one wants to correct a deficiency in oneself, the correction must go through the group. Meaning, asking the Creator to correct a deficiency in me is not the way to correct it. So I thought that prayer for correction, simple and specific about a deficiency has to be asked for/through the group first, then within each individual including oneself, and then outer like to other groups, Israel, Nations.

Prayer must have the right intent, be for the Good of His creations. It must be simple/specific. Bestowal is also simple specific, and bestowal cannot be given to one, or a group. Bestowal always is for all and affects all. So the prayer has to mirror that. In qualities “the” ask” itself has to be in a similar form as “the gift.”

As an example, I want to correct my inability to trust (and without trust there can be no faith, and vice versa), I would:

1. State the intention (I usually say thank you as well, and that I am doing it for His content)

2. Then ask first for the correction of Trust for the group

3. Ask for correction within each individual within the group, inclusive of me

4. Ask for correction for “outside” the group, other groups, Israel, Nations.

Is that the flow we should follow in asking for correction?

I understand I am looking at this very specifically, very sequentially, corporeally. However, that helps me in increasing the feeling of what I am asking, how I am asking, and why I am asking.

Thank you,

Peter

 

 

[Peter]

Hello,

Foremost, Thank You.

I wonder if you can help me to verify the understanding I have of Unity.

First, I am in Young Group M29. I wonder if I should be asking this question without asking it first in my group.

Second, the reason I am asking the following question, is because I would like to present this idea my group as I think it will help my friends.

Third, I am having an understanding of Unity within the 10, as Adhesion to each other. The experience of that quality equivalent in form to Adhesion to Him.

In the corporeal world, but also in the forces behind the corporeal world:

The thing called Unity in the Group 10 has has two parts: 1. things that we have in common, “Things in which we are the same,” AND 2. things that we have not in common, “Things in which we differ”

Within the Group, both have to be revealed.

Things that area revealed, and in which we are the same, adhere to each other like magnets. Things that are the same are One. These bond in Unity.

Now, to the things in which we differ. These also have to be revealed. But there are two pieces to these things in which we differ: 1. is the thing in which we differ, like Person 1 likes color Yellow, and Person 2 likes color Blue, AND 2. Is this difference revealed, or known, and Accepted.

The Acceptance of the difference nullifies the difference. In effect, the difference that Person 1 likes color Yellow and Person 2 likes the color Blue, this difference, when accepted, is absorbed, and becomes part of the Group.

This action nullifies the difference, and the Group is also in Unity, with the differences, and in fact in total Unity.

Now I am combining corporeal acts and assigning the reconciliation of differences through knowledge of its existence and acceptance.

In spiritual world the difference is corrected in the Group by Reforming Light.

The difference itself is NOT important, the correction occurs in spite the fact that Person 1 continues to prefer the color Yellow, and Person 2 prefers color Blue.

The final thought here is, that if the above mechanism works like that, then we should explore all differences, welcome discord, all correction. Through knowing that we can raise these to the Creator for correction, is the practice and strengthen Unity.

Am I looking at it in logical way?

Thank you,

 

Peter

 

[Peter]

It makes so much sense that the path to the Creator is through us, through each other, as One. I am awaiting with great anticipation to learn more about what we do and how we do it. A year ago I would walk away from any idea in working within a group. Today I am awaiting with anticipation to learn more. Thank you for that.

[Peter]

In a world where people are connected to each other through spiritual law of love, the perspective of looking and resolving issues would shift to its opposite from its current state. I feel that generally speaking our current approach to how we resolves issues is for each side to prove that their side is right or that it is not to blamed, or simply by one side bullying the other to submission. All of our global issues can be resolved right now, today, if we only looked at the issues from perspective of resolution and what is the solution, not which side is right or which side can argue better the righteousness of their position. In the world where spirituality and law of love drives our decisions, issues would resolve based on what is best option for the well being of the Whole. I also imagine that in such a world, issues may even never have the opportunity to arise at all. In such a world smoothly and in harmony, All of Nature would act only to benefits the Whole of Nature.

[Peter]

My goal is to sharpen my current understanding of the blueprint of creation (the nuts and bolts of the system), and grasp the meaning and spelling of Kabbalistic terms along the way, as well as Kabbalistic methods to stay consciously connected to the system.

[Peter]

Based on the class reading it seems that there are 3 levels in the Human Vitality Levels (Still, Vegetative, Animate and Human)3 parts:

Human level
Human Level with the point in the Hearth that is not being developed
Human Level with the Point in the Heart that is being consciously developed by the person (and this is the speaking level – that is the level we want to be on)

Is that correct to look at the HUMAN level in that way?

Also…

This week my faith in Kabbalah is being questioned in me like it was never before. My head has introduced reasonable doubts I have never thought of. The other truth is that I feel that any effort to leave Kabbalah would be futile. I feel deeply that the force pulling me forward is stronger and absolutely out of my control. That reminds me that I am in good hands and it is comforting. Yet part of me struggles with this truth, which I find makes no sense. Something in me does not want me to move forward. It must be my Ego because the reasons against Kabbalah are going through my head and are reasons. Facts based in this world not in the Upper World. The force pulling me forward has no reason to it, it just is. I dunno. Any advice on how to ease these periods of doubt? I begin asking the creator for courage and strength to stay on the path that he has for me.

Thank you,

Peter

• This reply was modified 11 months, 3 weeks ago by Peter.

[Author]

Replies